If you have children, you are probably familiar with ultrasounds. After all, it's what the OBGYN uses to take pictures of your baby while he or she is still developing. However, ultrasonography is useful in many areas of medicine to show pictures of body parts below the skin, including podiatry.
"Ultrasound" means that the machine is producing sound at a pitch much higher than what the human ear can detect. The doctor will place a transducer up against your foot, producing sound waves, and the machine detects the echoes that bounce back. Using these echoes, the machine is able to put together a picture of the different tissues in your foot in the same way that dolphins and submarines use sonar to detect other objects and hazards in the water.
So what is it good for? Since ultrasound depicts soft tissue problems, it is useful to diagnose plantar fasciitis and various tendonitis, though the list is longer. Other advantages:
- No radiation, unlike X-ray and CT
- Live Action—you don't have to wait for the image to develop because it's on the screen instantly
- The doctor can direct injections by watching where the needle is going on the screen
Another advantage to ultrasonography is the cost. An in office ultrasound ($100-$160) is significantly cheaper than an MRI which can cost 5 times as much. An MRI is a much more detailed image than an ultrasound, but in many cases they are not necessary. A common misconception amongst patients is that more medicine equals better medicine. While you might like to have the best diagnostic test out there, in the back of your podiatrist's mind is the question: is it worth it? Should we spend more money to get a more accurate diagnosis? Or can we get a good level of accuracy using low-tech methods? Podiatrists will disagree about the answer to these questions, since there are good arguments either way.